‘In my work, painting is the main thing, but I look for ways that I can escape it. The heart of it, you get rid of, so everything else is there. It’s all pointing towards what’s painting. So I would use those moments before and after making the artwork as a way of making art.’
You can also take the idea of 'building' in art in a completely different direction. For example, in the case of the Australian Kimball Gunnar Holth (1982). He is building an oeuvre in which painting is central, without making a painting that will be hung on the wall as a successful end product. Holth starts from the idea that a work of art does not have to look like a work of art to still be one. But what determines the boundary between what is and what is not art? Holth's work is concerned with the thin line between 'doing nothing' and 'doing something' that makes the essential difference between the two categories and determines whether or not something belongs to the art world.
For 'Cleaning Cabinet', for example, he used cleaning products from the gallery and from home, which he placed on the middle shelf of the cabinet to use. On the other shelves he put products from the kitchen cabinets of the gallery that he does not need. In doing so, he made the question insightful 'When does something matter and when not?', which is basically the same question as 'When is something recognizable as art and when not?. For example, a box is a container, but it also has qualities that allow you to see it as a canvas and treat it as such.
Holth is building an oeuvre that revolves around painting as long as it isn’t a painting. Like a painter, he makes compositions, uses his arms and hands, uses colour, brushes and paint and makes choices. Only not in relation to the painting as an art-historically loaded end product - 'a cliché', according to the artist - but as an attempt to make a painting that will never be made.